Psychology dissertation non significant results

Most relevant threats to external validity include sample bias and specific characteristics of the sample that limit generalization of findings Drotar, b. However, it would be impossible to fully discuss the implications of your results without making reference to causality.

Writing the Discussion Section The purpose of the discussion is to give readers specific guidance about what was accomplished in the study, the scientific significance, and what research needs to be done next.

If applicable, authors may also wish to present counterarguments that temper the primary threats to validity they discuss.


What should the researcher do. A naive researcher would interpret this finding as evidence that the new treatment is no more effective than the traditional treatment. Examples Opening Paragraph -- restate RQ, then provide major result Overall, attitudes and perceptions of both urban and rural primary care patients in this sample show that they are generally receptive to the possibility of receiving medical and psychiatric services via telehealth.

This result, therefore, does not give even a hint that the null hypothesis is false. For example, authors should present the sample sizes, means, and standard deviations for all dependent measures and the direction, magnitude, degrees of freedom, and exact p levels for inferential statistics.

Limitations Some study limitations merit comment. Commonly identified threats to internal validity include issues related to study design, measurement, and statistical power.

Bond is, in fact, just barely better than chance at judging whether a martini was shaken or stirred. The experimenter should report that there is no credible evidence Mr. Reviewers also appreciate being informed about how specific research recommendations can advance the field.

Writing in Psychology

Where possible, support your speculation with references. However, no one would be able to prove definitively that I was not.

Treatment noncompletion rates, although higher than average for our clinic, were in the acceptable range. Future directions may also include interesting next steps in the research.

In the current sample, telehealth PE treatment was safe and pragmatically viable. Thus, our diagnoses are tentative and additional research using more formal diagnostic assessments of PTSD and other psychiatric diagnoses may be warranted.

Readers and reviewers should be able to identify which specific hypotheses were supported, which received partial support, and which were not supported.

How would the significance test come out. For this reason, it is helpful for authors to provide an overview of the primary sections of their results and also to take readers through their findings in a step-by-step fashion.

If you had more people or whatevers then you would have been more likely to find a significant effect. Using a method for combining probabilities, it can be determined that combining the probability values of 0. Ensure that your abstract correctly reflects the purpose and content of your paper.

The third and final in a series of editorials Drotar, abthis article provides guidance for authors to prepare effective results and discussion sections. An abstract is a super-short summary and is difficult to write.

Finally, it is also problematic to introduce new findings in the discussion that have not been described in the results. Provide your name and institutional affiliation Hanover College.

Do not include information that does not appear in the body of the paper. This overview should follow directly from the data analysis plan stated in the method Drotar, b. For this reason, it is helpful for authors to provide an overview of the primary sections of their results and also to take readers through their findings in a step-by-step fashion.

This is the final in the series of editorials that are intended to be helpful to authors and reviewers and improve the quality of the science in the field of pediatric psychology. Authors face the significant challenge of presenting their results in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP) completely, yet succinctly and writing a convinc.

Database of example psychology dissertations - these dissertations were produced by students to aid you with your studies. Psychology Dissertation Examples. Search to find a specific psychology dissertation or browse from the list below: Trait Paradigm of Psychology and How It Applies To the Measurement of Intelligence and Personality.

If Sophie gets a non-significant result on her statistical analysis, it means that she can't rule out the possibility that the difference in the two groups is caused by chance. Results Section. The results section is where you tell the reader the basic descriptive information about the scales you used (report the mean and standard deviation for each scale).

If your correlation was non significant, but p. Consider Statistical Analyses that Document Clinical Significance of Results Improving the clinical significance of research findings remains an important but elusive goal for the field of pediatric psychology (Drotar & Lemanek, ).

Help please! My dissertation statistical test has resulted in not significant?

Not all psychological studies depend on quantitative measurements and statistical significance tests. For the results sections of qualitative studies, careful description and contextualization are most important, says Sue Morrow, PhD, an associate professor of counseling psychology at the University of Utah.

Please turn JavaScript on and reload the page. Psychology dissertation non significant results
Rated 3/5 based on 96 review
Interpreting Non-Significant Results